Rhonda Copelon
Women Human Rights Defenders
WHRDs are self-identified women and lesbian, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LBTQI) people and others who defend rights and are subject to gender-specific risks and threats due to their human rights work and/or as a direct consequence of their gender identity or sexual orientation.
WHRDs are subject to systematic violence and discrimination due to their identities and unyielding struggles for rights, equality and justice.
The WHRD Program collaborates with international and regional partners as well as the AWID membership to raise awareness about these risks and threats, advocate for feminist and holistic measures of protection and safety, and actively promote a culture of self-care and collective well being in our movements.
Risks and threats targeting WHRDs
WHRDs are exposed to the same types of risks that all other defenders who defend human rights, communities, and the environment face. However, they are also exposed to gender-based violence and gender-specific risks because they challenge existing gender norms within their communities and societies.
By defending rights, WHRDs are at risk of:
- Physical assault and death
- Intimidation and harassment, including in online spaces
- Judicial harassment and criminalization
- Burnout
A collaborative, holistic approach to safety
We work collaboratively with international and regional networks and our membership
- to raise awareness about human rights abuses and violations against WHRDs and the systemic violence and discrimination they experience
- to strengthen protection mechanisms and ensure more effective and timely responses to WHRDs at risk
We work to promote a holistic approach to protection which includes:
- emphasizing the importance of self-care and collective well being, and recognizing that what care and wellbeing mean may differ across cultures
- documenting the violations targeting WHRDs using a feminist intersectional perspective;
- promoting the social recognition and celebration of the work and resilience of WHRDs ; and
- building civic spaces that are conducive to dismantling structural inequalities without restrictions or obstacles
Our Actions
We aim to contribute to a safer world for WHRDs, their families and communities. We believe that action for rights and justice should not put WHRDs at risk; it should be appreciated and celebrated.
-
Promoting collaboration and coordination among human rights and women’s rights organizations at the international level to strengthen responses concerning safety and wellbeing of WHRDs.
-
Supporting regional networks of WHRDs and their organizations, such as the Mesoamerican Initiative for WHRDs and the WHRD Middle East and North Africa Coalition, in promoting and strengthening collective action for protection - emphasizing the establishment of solidarity and protection networks, the promotion of self-care, and advocacy and mobilization for the safety of WHRDs;
-
Increasing the visibility and recognition of WHRDs and their struggles, as well as the risks that they encounter by documenting the attacks that they face, and researching, producing, and disseminating information on their struggles, strategies, and challenges:
-
Mobilizing urgent responses of international solidarity for WHRDs at risk through our international and regional networks, and our active membership.
Related Content
2021: Feminist Power in Action
In 2021, AWID, along with many other organizations, was coming to grips with the implications of the on-going global pandemic for how we work and our role in this particular time. The year taught us three critical lessons about navigating this moment as a global feminist movement-support organization.
Download the full 2021 Annual review
Through dialogue and exchanges critical to their work, AWID connected thousands to feminists from around the world.
Our experience in 2021 reaffirmed the importance of building and sustaining a global feminist community, and AWID’s core mission to support feminist movements as a whole. We believe that at this moment, a strong community bound by a shared vision and collective care is the foundation of all social change and transformation.
Ma langue ne fait pas partie des langues officielles de l’enquête, et j’ai du mal à y répondre - que puis-je faire?
L’AWID est engagée en faveur de la justice linguistique, et nous regrettons que l’enquête WITM ne puisse, à l’heure actuelle, être accessible dans d’autres langues. Cependant, si vous avez besoin d’une aide à la traduction ou que vous souhaitez participer à l’enquête dans une autre langue, n’hésitez pas à nous contacter à l’adresse witm@awid.org.
WHRDs from the South and Southeast Asian region
7 Women Human Rights Defenders from across the South and Southeast Asian region are honored in this year’s Online Tribute. These defenders have made key contributions to advancing human and women’s rights, indigenous people’s rights, and the right to education. These WHRDs were lawyers, women’s rights activists, scholars, and politicians. Please join AWID in commemorating t their work and legacy by sharing the memes below with your colleagues, networks and friends and by using the hashtags #WHRDTribute and #16Days.
Please click on each image below to see a larger version and download as a file
Efua Dorkenoo
Conocida afectuosamente como «Mama Efua», su trabajo con el movimiento para terminar con la mutilación genital femenina (MGF) se extendió a lo largo de tres décadas y ayudó a llamar la atención internacional y a generar acciones para erradicar esta práctica dañina.
En 1983, Efua fue una de las fundadoras de FORWARD (The Foundation for Women’s Health, Research and Development, La fundación para la salud de las mujeres, la investigación y el desarrollo), que se convirtió en una organización líder en la batalla por crear conciencia sobre la MGF. Su libro de 1994, Cortar la rosa: mutilación genital femenina, es considerado el primer libro sobre MGF y aparece en la lista de «Los 100 mejores libros africanos del siglo XX» de la Universidad de Columbia.
Originaria de Ghana y enfermera de profesión, Efua se incorporó a la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) en 1995 y con empeño logró la inclusión de la MGF en las agendas de los Estados miembros de la OMS. También trabajó estrechamente con el Gobierno nigeriano en la elaboración de una política nacional integral que sentó las bases para las leyes contra la MGF de Nigeria, que todavía están vigentes. Su trabajo pionero culminó en una campaña liderada por África, «La generación de las niñas», dedicada a terminar con la MGF en el plazo de una generación.
Efua demostró que una persona puede convertirse en una voz unificadora para un movimiento y ahora resultan más relevantes que nunca sus sabias palabras: «la identidad compartida puede ayudar a reunir a activistas que vienen de contextos diferentes y a que tengan un sentido de propósito en común».
Snippet FEA argentina history cooperatives (EN)
Argentina has a long history of worker-run cooperatives and workplaces.
In 2001, the country experienced one of the worst economic crises in its history.
As a response to the recession and a form of resistance and resilience, workers across the country started occupying their workplaces.
The Nadia Echazú Textile Cooperative was the first cooperative created by and for trans and travesti people in search of economic autonomy and decent living conditions.
It provides work opportunities, access to social security, sustainable income and economic rights for the communities it serves.
Betu Singh
Ritu
Biography
Ritu is a feminist technologist who brings her experience in the non-profit sector, driven by a passion for utilizing innovative approaches to finding feminist technological solutions. Holding a Master's in Technology in Computer Applications from the Indian Institute of Technology, her role at AWID encompasses a diverse range of responsibilities. From overseeing digital security and server management to database administration, capacity building, technology evaluation, software implementation and cloud solutions, Ritu ensures that AWID's IT infrastructure is resilient and effective. Prior to joining AWID, she played a pivotal role in advancing technological initiatives in the Health Promotion and Environment sectors, fueled by her dedication to leveraging technology for social good.
Position
IT Manager
Add to stories
Off
How much time does the survey take to complete?
The estimated time to complete the survey is 30 minutes.
Before you begin
Before starting the WITM research methodology, it is important you prepare the background and know what to expect.
Capacity
With AWID’s WITM research methodology, we recommend that you first review the entire toolkit.
While this toolkit is designed to democratize WITM research, there are capacity constraints related to resources and research experience that may affect your organization’s ability use this methodology.
Use the “Ready to Go?” Worksheet to assess your readiness to begin your own WITM research. The more questions you can answer on this worksheet, the more prepared you are to undertake your research.
Trust
Before beginning any research, we recommend that you assess your organization’s connections and trust within your community.
In many contexts, organizations may be hesitant to openly share financial data with others for reasons ranging from concerns about how the information will be used, to fear of funding competition and anxiety over increasing government restrictions on civil society organizations.
As you build relationships and conduct soft outreach in the lead-up to launching your research, ensuring that your objectives are clear will be useful in creating trust. Transparency will allow participants to understand why you are collecting the data and how it will benefit the entire community.
We highly recommend that you ensure data is collected confidentially and shared anonymously. By doing so, participants will be more comfortable sharing sensitive information with you.
First step
We also recommend referring to our “Ready to Go?” Worksheet to assess your own progress.
Zita Kavungirwa Kayange
Zita était une défenseure des droits des femmes de la région du Grand Kivu.
Elle a été la première directrice exécutive d’UWAKI, une organisation de femmes bien connue. Par son travail avec le Réseau des Femmes pour la Défense des Droits et la Paix (RFDP) et le Caucus des femmes du Sud-Kivu pour la paix, elle a consacré sa vie à rétablir la paix dans l'est de la RDC. Elle a très fermement dénoncé l'utilisation de la violence sexuelle comme arme de guerre.
En 2006, elle s'est présentée comme candidate aux premières élections démocratiques en RDC. Bien qu’elle n’ait pas gagné, elle a continué à défendre les droits des femmes et la communauté du Sud-Kivu se souvient d’elle avec affection.
Snippet FEA Life expectancy of a trans and travesti (ES)
La expectativa de vida de una persona trans y travesti en Argentina es de 37 años - la edad promedio de la población general es de 77 años.
Helen Rumbali
Priscilla Hon
Biography
Priscilla posee prácticamente dos décadas de experiencia de trabajo en el sector sin fines de lucro con organizaciones por la justicia social abocadas a los derechos de las mujeres y las juventudes, la conservación, la consolidación de la paz y el desarrollo. Sus intereses se centran en establecer procesos y sistemas progresistas que ayuden a una organización a operar de acuerdo a sus valores y principios y a prosperar, así como en encontrar formas de ayudar a las organizaciones y los donantes a identificar y garantizar los recursos que necesitan para una buena labor. Priscilla se unió a AWID en 2018, como Gerente de Movilización de Recursos y, en julio de 2023, asumió el cargo de Directora de Operaciones y Alianzas para el Financiamiento.
Posee una Maestría en Política Internacional de la Escuela de Estudios Orientales y Africanos (SOAS), una pila cada vez más alta de libros para los que todavía intenta encontrar tiempo para leer e integra la Junta de Hodan Somali Community, una entidad benéfica radicada en Londres.
Position
Directora de Operaciones y Alianzas para el Financiamiento
Add to stories
Off
No me siento cómodx al compartir el nombre de mi agrupación o nuestra información de contacto con AWID, ¿aun así debería responder la encuesta?
Absolutamente; esas preguntas son opcionales y valoramos tu derecho a la anonimidad. Te pedimos que respondas la encuesta independientemente de tu decisión de compartir el nombre de tu agrupación, organización o movimiento y la información de contacto con AWID.
4. Collect and analyze your data
This section will guide you on how to ensure your research findings are representative and reliable.
In this section:
- Collect your data
1. Before launch
2. Launch
3. During launch- Prepare your data for analysis
1. Clean your data
2. Code open-ended responses
3. Remove unecessary data
4. Make it safe- Create your topline report
- Analyze your data
1. Statistical programs
2. Suggested points for analysis
Collect your data
1. Before launch
- First determine the best way to reach your survey population.
For example, if you want to focus on indigenous women’s rights organizers, do you know who the key networks are? Do you have contacts there, people who can introduce you to these organizations or ways of reaching them? - Determine if your key population can be easily reached with an online survey, if you need to focus on paper survey distribution and collection or a mix of both. This decision is very important to ensure accessibility and inclusiveness.
- Be prepared! Prior to advertizing, create a list of online spaces where you can promote your survey.
If you are distributing paper versions, create a list of events, spaces and methods for distributing and collecting results. - Plan your timeline in advance, so you can avoid launching your survey during major holidays or long vacation periods.
- Make it easy for your advisors and partners to advertize the survey – offer them pre-written Twitter, Facebook and email messages that they can copy and paste.
2. Launch
- Send the link to the survey via email through your organization’s email databases.
- Advertize on your organization’s social media. Similar to your newsletter, you can regularly advertize the survey while it is open.
- If your organization is hosting events that reach members of your survey population, this is a good space to advertize the survey and distribute paper versions as needed.
- Invite your advisors to promote the survey with their email lists and ask them to copy you so you are aware of their promotional messages. Remember to send them follow-up reminders if they’ve agreed to disseminate.
- Approach funders to share your survey with their grantees. It is in their interest that their constituencies respond to a survey that will improve their own work in the field.
3. During launch
- Keep the survey open for a minimum of four weeks to ensure everyone has time to take it and you have time to widely advertize it.
- Send reminders through your email databases and your partners databases asking people to participate in the survey. To avoid irritating recipients with too many emails, we recommend sending two additional reminder emails: one at midway point while your survey is open and another a week before your survey closes.
- As part of your outreach, remember to state that you are only collecting one response per organization. This will make cleaning your data much easier when you are preparing it for analysis.
- Save an extra week! Halfway through the open window for survey taking, check your data set. How have you done so far? Run initial numbers to see how many groups have responded, from which locations, etc. If you see gaps, reach out to those specific populations. Also, consider extending your deadline by a week – if you do so, include this extension deadline in one of your reminder emails, informing people know there is more time to complete the survey. Many answers tend to come in during the last week of the survey or after the extended deadline.
If you also plan to collect data from applications sent to grant-making institutions, this is a good time to reach out them.
When collecting this data, consider what type of applications you would like to review. Your research framing will guide you in determining this.
Also, it may be unnecessary to see every application sent to the organization – instead, it will be more useful and efficient to review only eligible applications (regardless of whether they were funded).
You can also ask grant-making institutions to share their data with you.
Prepare your data for analysis
Your survey has closed and now you have all this information! Now you need to ensure your data is as accurate as possible.
Depending on your sample size and amount of completed surveys, this step can be lengthy. Tapping into a strong pool of detail-oriented staff will speed up the process and ensure greater accuracy at this stage.
Also, along with your surveys, you may have collected data from applications sent to grant-making institutions. Use these same steps to sort that data as well. Do not get discouraged if you cannot compare the two data sets! Funders collect different information from what you collected in the surveys. In your final research report and products, you can analyze and present the datasets (survey versus grant-making institution data) separately.
1. Clean your data
- Resolve and remove duplications: If there is more than one completed survey for one organization, reach out to the organization and determine which one is the most accurate.
- Remove ineligible responses: Go through each completed survey and remove any responses that did not properly answer the question. Replace it with “null”, thus keeping it out of your analysis.
- Consistently format numerical data: For example, you may remove commas, decimals and dollar signs from numerical responses. Financial figures provided in different currencies may need to be converted.
2. Code open-ended responses
There are two styles of open-ended responses that require coding.
Questions with open-ended responses
For these questions, you will need to code responses in order to track trends.
Some challenges you will face with this is:
- People will not use the exact same words to describe similar responses
- Surveys with multiple language options will require translation and then coding
- Staff capacity to review and code each open-ended response.
If using more than one staff member to review and code, you will need to ensure consistency of coding. Thus, this is why we recommend limiting your open-ended questions and as specific as possible for open-ended questions you do ask.
For example, if you had the open-ended question “What specific challenges did you face in fundraising this year?” and some common responses cite “lack of staff,” or “economic recession,” you will need to code each of those responses so you can analyze how many participants are responding in a similar way.
For closed-end questions
If you provided the participant with the option of elaborating on their response, you will also need to “up-code” these responses.
For several questions in the survey, you may have offered the option of selecting the category “Other” With “Other” options, it is common to offer a field in which the participant can elaborate.
You will need to “up-code” such responses by either:
- Converting open-ended responses to the correct existing categories (this is known as “up-coding”). As a simple example, consider your survey asks participants “what is your favorite color?” and you offer the options “blue,” “green,” and “other.” There may be some participants that choose “other” and in their explanation they write “the color of the sky is my favorite color.” You would then “up-code” answers like these to the correct category, in this case, the category “blue.”
- Creating a new category if there are several “others” that have a common theme. (This is similar to coding the first type of open-ended responses). Consider the previous example question of favorite color. Perhaps many participants chose “other” and then wrote “red” is their favorite. In this case, you would create a new category of “red” to track all responses that answered “red.”
- Removing “others” that do not fit any existing or newly created categories.
3. Remove unecessary data
Analyze the frequency of the results
For each quantitative question, you can decide whether you should remove the top or bottom 5% or 1% to prevent outliers* from skewing your results. You can also address the skewing effect of outliers by using median average rather than the mean average. Calculate the median by sorting responses in order, and selecting the number in the middle. However, keep in mind that you may still find outlier data useful. It will give you an idea of the range and diversity of your survey participants and you may want to do case studies on the outliers.
* An outlier is a data point that is much bigger or much smaller than the majority of data points. For example, imagine you live in a middle-class neighborhood with one billionaire. You decide that you want to learn what the range of income is for middle-class families in your neighborhood. In order to do so, you must remove the billionaire income from your dataset, as it is an outlier. Otherwise, your mean middle-class income will seem much higher than it really is.
Remove the entire survey for participants who do not fit your target population. Generally you can recognize this by the organizations’ names or through their responses to qualitative questions.
4. Make it safe
To ensure confidentiality of the information shared by respondents, at this stage you can replace organization names with a new set of ID numbers and save the coding, matching names with IDs in a separate file.
With your team, determine how the coding file and data should be stored and protected.
For example, will all data be stored on a password-protected computer or server that only the research team can access?
Create your topline report
A topline report will list every question that was asked in your survey, with the response percentages listed under each question. This presents the collective results of all individual responses.
Tips:
- Consistency is important: the same rules should be applied to every outlier when determining if it should stay or be removed from the dataset.
- For all open (“other”) responses that are up-coded, ensure the coding matches. Appoint a dedicated point person to randomly check codes for consistency and reliability and recode if necessary.
- If possible, try to ensure that you can work at least in a team of two, so that there is always someone to check your work.
Analyze your data
Now that your data is clean and sorted, what does it all mean? This is the fun part where you begin to analyze for trends.
Are there prominent types of funders (government versus corporate)? Are there regions that receive more funding? Your data will reveal some interesting information.
1. Statistical programs
-
Smaller samples (under 150 responses) may be done in-house using an Excel spreadsheet.
-
Larger samples (above 150 responses) may be done in-house using Excel if your analysis will be limited to tallying overall responses, simple averages or other simple analysis.
-
If you plan to do more advanced analysis, such as multivariate analysis, then we recommend using statistical software such as SPSS, Stata or R.
NOTE: SPSS and Stata are expensive whereas R is free.
All three types of software require staff knowledge and are not easy to learn quickly.
Try searching for interns or temporary staff from local universities. Many students must learn statistical analysis as part of their coursework and may have free access to SPSS or Stata software through their university. They may also be knowledgeable in R, which is free to download and use.
2. Suggested points for analysis
- Analysis of collective budget sizes
- Analysis of budget sizes by region or type of organization
- Most common funders
- Total amount of all funding reported
- Total percentages of type of funding (corporate, government, etc)
- Most funded issues/populations
- Changes over time in any of these results.
Previous step
Next step
Estimated time:
• 2 - 3 months
People needed:
• 1 or more research person(s)
• Translator(s), if offering survey in multiple languages
• 1 or more person(s) to assist with publicizing survey to target population
• 1 or more data analysis person(s)
Resources needed:
• List of desired advisors: organizations, donors, and activists
• Optional: an incentive prize to persuade people to complete your survey
• Optional: an incentive for your advisors
Resources available:
Survey platforms:
• Survey Monkey
• Survey Gizmo (Converts to SPSS for analysis very easily)
Examples:
• 2011 WITM Global Survey
• Sample of WITM Global Survey
• Sample letter to grantmakers requesting access to databases
Visualising Information for Advocacy:
• Cleaning Data Tools
• Tools to present your data in compelling ways
• Tutorial: Gentle Introduction to Cleaning Data
Previous step
Next step
Ready to Go? Worksheet
Bessy Ferrera
Bessy Ferrera a défendu sans relâche les droits humains des personnes trans, travailleuses du sexe et séropositives au Honduras.
Bessy était aussi membre d’Arcoíris, une organisation qui soutient la communauté LGBTI+. Elle était en outre la personne référente de la plateforme Derechos aquí y Ahora (les droits ici et maintenant) au Honduras et plaidait fermement en faveur d’une pleine citoyenneté pour les personnes trans, ainsi que pour l’adoption d’une loi sur l’identité de genre qui permettrait aux personnes trans de changer légalement d’identité de genre.
« Depuis le début de l’année [2019], la communauté trans a été victime d’une série d’attaques, parce qu’elle a défendu et demandé des droits. » Rihanna Ferrera (sœur de Bessy)
Bessy était une travailleuse du sexe qui a été tuée par balle par deux hommes, au début du mois de juillet 2019, alors qu’elle travaillait dans les rues Comayagüela. Ses assaillants ont par la suite été arrêtés.
Bessy fait partie des nombreux·ses activistes des droits LGBTI+ du Honduras, assassiné·e·s en raison de leur identité et de leur travail, parmi qui se trouvent : Cynthia Nicole, Angy Ferreira, Estefania "Nia" Zuniga, Gloria Carolina Hernandez Vasquez, Paola Barraza, Violeta Rivas et Sherly Montoya.
Le cas de Bessy incarne l’injustice, de même qu’un problème plus large de violence systémique à laquelle se confronte la communauté LGBTI+ au Honduras, puisque l’État ne parvient pas à garantir l’offre de droits ni à fournir une protection. Cela est à l’origine d’une culture de l’impunité.
Malgré les risques auxquels sont confronté.e.s les activistes LGBTI+ au Honduras, tous et toutes continuent leur travail pour défier et résister à la violence, ainsi que pour combattre la stigmatisation et la discrimination au quotidien.
« Si je meurs, il faut que ce soit pour quelque chose de bien, pas pour une futilité. Je ne veux pas mourir en fuyant, en étant lâche. Si je meurs, je veux que les gens disent que je suis mort·e en me battant pour ce qui m’appartient » - membre d’Arcoíris
Snippet FEA Financial Precarities (FR)
est constante
Marinalva Manoel
Marta Musić
Biography
Marta est chercheur·se et activiste queer, transféministe et non binaire, originaire de l'ex-Yougoslavie, actuellement basé·e à Barcelone. Iel facilite des mouvements transnationaux, tisse des alternatives systémiques et est économiste féministe. Iel a cofondé et coordonné avec d’autres la Tapisserie mondiale des alternatives, un processus mondial qui cherche à identifier, documenter et relier les alternatives aux niveaux local, régional et mondial. À l’échelle locale, Marta est engagé·e au sein d’organisations antiracistes, transféministes, queer et migrantes. Iel détient également un doctorat en sciences et technologies environnementales de l'Université autonome de Barcelone, consacré aux perspectives féministes décoloniales d'une pluralité d'alternatives systémiques et à la création de systèmes alternatifs féministes basés sur les soins et la pérennité de la vie. Pendant son temps libre, iel aime boxer, jouer de la guitare et de la batterie dans un groupe de samba, faire de la photographie, de la randonnée, cuisiner pour ses proches et gâter ses deux chats.
Position
Responsable de la Construction d’Économies Féministes
Add to stories
Off