Women human rights defenders (WHRDs) worldwide defend their lands, livelihoods and communities from extractive industries and corporate power. They stand against powerful economic and political interests driving land theft, displacement of communities, loss of livelihoods, and environmental degradation.
Why resist extractive industries?
Extractivism is an economic and political model of development that commodifies nature and prioritizes profit over human rights and the environment. Rooted in colonial history, it reinforces social and economic inequalities locally and globally. Often, Black, rural and Indigenous women are the most affected by extractivism, and are largely excluded from decision-making. Defying these patriarchal and neo-colonial forces, women rise in defense of rights, lands, people and nature.
Critical risks and gender-specific violence
WHRDs confronting extractive industries experience a range of risks, threats and violations, including criminalization, stigmatization, violence and intimidation. Their stories reveal a strong aspect of gendered and sexualized violence. Perpetrators include state and local authorities, corporations, police, military, paramilitary and private security forces, and at times their own communities.
Acting together
AWID and the Women Human Rights Defenders International Coalition (WHRD-IC) are pleased to announce “Women Human Rights Defenders Confronting Extractivism and Corporate Power”; a cross-regional research project documenting the lived experiences of WHRDs from Asia, Africa and Latin America.
We encourage activists, members of social movements, organized civil society, donors and policy makers to read and use these products for advocacy, education and inspiration.
AWID acknowledges with gratitude the invaluable input of every Woman Human Rights Defender who participated in this project. This project was made possible thanks to your willingness to generously and openly share your experiences and learnings. Your courage, creativity and resilience is an inspiration for us all. Thank you!
Nuestras/os afiliadas/os tanto individuales como institucionales provienen de todas las regiones del mundo y de 163 países; las/os más recientes se nos han unido desde Zimbabue, Turquía y los Estados Unidos. ¡Todas/os nuestras/os afiliadas/os aportan una rica y diversa gama de perspectivas, experiencias, conocimiento, energía e inspiración!
¿Sabías que cada semana publicamos perfiles de afiliadas/os?
Uno de los beneficios de ser afiliada/o de AWID es que tu historia sea destacada en nuestro boletín informativo, el cual llega a 35,000 suscriptoras/es, y a través de nuestros canales en las redes sociales que tienen más de 60,000 seguidores.
Publicaciones recientes:
Conoce a Angila Ashitua, una joven afiliada a AWID que vive en el condado de Vihiga, Kenia Occidental.
Aprendiendo más acerca del trabajo que hace AWID y de temas relativos a los derechos de las mujeres y la justicia social por medio de nuestras publicaciones y recursos, incluyendo el último video "Cambiando sistemas, cambiando vidas". [disponible solo en inglés]
Participando en nuestras sesiones de aprendizaje electrónico. ¡Mira lo más destacado de nuestro seminario en línea sobre justicia fiscal! [disponible solo en inglés]
¡Y mucho más!
Puedes renovar tu membresía por uno, dos o tres años; también ofrecemos membresías individuales e institucionales gratis a quienes tengan bajos ingresos o presupuestos.
Si tienes alguna dificultad y necesitas apoyo con el proceso de inscripción, por favor no dudes en comunicarte conmigo a través de membership@awid.org
Testemonios de nuestras/os afiliadas/os
"AWID nos ha resultado una red muy interesante y estamos participando en muchas de sus plataformas". - Engabu Za Tooro (afiliada/o institucional AWID)
"Espero una colaboración fructífera con el equipo. Me siento excelente. Gracias por aceptarme como afiliada". - R. Chakraborty (afiliada individual AWID)
"Muchas gracias, AWID, pues el trabajo que hacen es formidable. Aprecio realmente sus esfuerzos". - E. Khan (afiliada individual AWID)
Une fois que vous aurez analysé l’ensemble des données issues du sondage, des interviews, de la recherche documentaire et possiblement d’autres sources, vous pourrez créer votre produit final.
Votre produit final sera le document qui synthétisera, analysera et posera un regard critique sur vos données. Ce sera la composante que vous partagerez avec votre communauté afin de présenter et d’expliquer votre recherche à votre auditoire.
À l’AWID, nous rédigeons fréquemment un rapport complet qui analyse chaque ensemble de données et qui synthétise tous nos résultats pour ensuite créer des produits plus concis comme des infographies et des sommaires (expliqué plus loin dans la section « Finalisez et mettez en forme »).
1. Écrivez clairement
Organisez vos données comme si vous vouliez raconter une histoire. Vous pouvez suivre l’ordre de votre sondage. Vous pouvez également regrouper certaines questions qui mènent à votre conclusion de façon cohérente et progressive.
Adaptez votre langage à votre public. Employez un langage universel et évitez le jargon ou les termes trop techniques.
L’importance de la révision
La personne chargée de la révision relira votre document, s’assurera qu’il est rédigé de manière concise, procédera à la vérification des faits, soulèvera les incohérences qui doivent être résolues, assurera la fluidité du texte et suggérera éventuellement des titres.
Il est préférable que cette personne connaisse et comprenne votre travail WITM, sans être engagée dans la recherche. Ainsi, elle apportera au document une nouvelle perspective.
2. Rendez-le attrayant
Créez des tableaux et des graphiques à l’aide des données recueillies. Ce type de documents visuels est très utile pour faire ressortir les principaux résultats de votre recherche et pour valider votre analyse.
Utilisez des images pertinentes qui illustrent vos propos.
Mettez en évidence les principaux chiffres et/ou les témoignages percutants.
Rappel : Plus votre produit est accessible, plus les gens auront envie de le lire…et de le partager!
À cette étape, vous avez recueilli toutes vos données, vous les avez analysées et vous avez transformé ces renseignements en produit final, probablement en un long rapport.
1. Peaufinez vos résultats
Avant de passer à la prochaine étape, vous devriez partager votre produit final avec les organisations, les activistes et les donateurs qui vous conseillent.
C’est le moment idéal pour vérifier les aspects suivants :
Est-ce qu’il manque des points clés à votre analyse des tendances et du panorama actuels du financement ?
Est-ce qu’il manque des points clés à vos conclusions ?
Y a-t-il des données inexactes qui doivent être corrigées ?
Y a-t-il des suggestions de nature générale sur la manière de renforcer le rapport afin d’atteindre les objectifs fixés dans le cadre de référence de la recherche.
Lorsque vous aurez intégré toutes les réactions de vos conseillers et conseillères, assurez-vous de présenter le document à la personne chargée des révisions.
Vous aurez ainsi en main la version finale et complète de votre rapport. Si vous prévoyez de publier votre rapport final en d’autres langues, il est temps de le faire traduire.
2. Encouragez les réactions
Les personnes qui vous conseillent seront probablement très occupées. Assurez-vous de leur accorder un délai raisonnable lorsque vous leur demandez de commenter le texte.
Soyez brefs et spécifiques lorsque vous sollicitez des commentaires, de sorte qu’il leur soit facile d’y répondre. Si vous le souhaitez, vous pouvez simplement copier et coller la liste des points que nous vous avons fournie.
Si vous publiez en plusieurs langues, assurez-vous que vos conseillers et conseillères vérifient la ou les versions finales traduites de vos produits.
Il s’agit d’une contribution considérable de la part de vos conseillers et conseillères. Pensez à leur offrir une forme de reconnaissance.
• 1 personne (ou plus) chargée de la recherche
• 1 éditeur-trice (spécialisé-e web si vous créez des prduits en ligne)
• Traducteur(s)-trice(s), si vous réalisez votre recherche en différentes langues
Ressources requises :
• Liste d’organisations, de donateurs et d’activistes agissant à titre consultatif
• Note conceptuelle (définie par votre cadre de référence)
• Résultats préliminaires de votre sondage
• Questions d'interview
• Résultats de vos interview
• Données de votre recherche documentaire
• Toutes les données utilsées dans le rapport
Snippet FEA how important essential workers are (ES)
La pandemia de COVID-19 le mostró al mundo la importancia de lxs trabajadorxs esenciales. Estamos hablando de limpiadorxs, enfermerxs, paramédicxs, trabajadorxs del hogar, transportistxs, las personas que trabajan en los supermercados, entre muchísimas otras. Su trabajo es atender y garantizar el bienestar de lxs demás y hacer funcionar nuestras economías.
In the current context, we have identified five major threats to the struggle towards feminist just economies.
1. Financialisation of the world economy.
“Financialisation refers to the increasing importance of financial markets, financial motives, financial institutions, and financial elites in the operation of the economy and its governing institutions both at the national and international levels”. - Gerald Epstein
Epstein Gerald A. 2006: Financialization and the World Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Financial institutions exert a strong influence over economic governance and the direction of development policy. The growing dominance of the corporate sector and international financial institutions in defining local and global public policies, has resulted in the capture of the State in the interest of capital. The current financial system, including controversial credit and debt policies, are integral to the reproduction and expansion of capital accumulation processes.
This raises important questions of how to regulate and re-think the global financial system, not only to avoid serious negative consequences of debt-driven crises,but to allow for sustainable livelihoods and the realization of economic and social rights without retrogression.
For the past 20 years, trade agreements (both bilateral or multilateral) have expanded their role demonstrating increased interest in Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) to be given to corporations.
IPR has clearly benefitted transnational corporations with huge impacts on the ability of poorer nations and peoples to realize human rights, notably:
the right to food,
the right to conserve,
the right to use and sell seeds, and
the right to access to essential medicines.
In addition, agriculture import liberalisation resulting in an influx of cheap goods jeopardise women’s self-employed farmers in poor countries and food security. Investment protection clauses included in trade agreements limit the policy space of national governments to create and enforce regulations on issues as crucial as environmental protection, labour rights, and the duration of copyrights.
Feminist movements have been, and are, at the forefront of resistance to these agreements exposing its pitfalls.
3. Unprecedented scale of threat to ecosystems and biodiversity.
The commodification of the Earth’s resources and resulting environmental degradation and climate change produced by decades of aggressive industrialisation, plunder and extractivism of the world’s resources, have damaged biodiversity and ecological resilience. These damages are now threatening the existence of human society itself.
The international community has failed to address production and consumption patterns sitting at the root of the problem. Instead, governments –with the support of large corporations interested in making a profit - are leaning towards a “green economy” approach promoting “energy-efficient technologies” (including nuclear energy, biofuels, genetically modified organisms and geo-engineering) and carbon trade schemes as the silver bullet.
4.Commodification of land and accelerating global phenomenon of land and resource grabbing.
While the processes of land and resource appropriation is not new – in fact, they are central struggles in colonial histories- what is new is the advanced means by which land and natural resource wealth are becoming commodities in new markets.
International Financial Institutions play a central role in promoting land markets in developing countries. These institutions finance land reforms that enable powerful actors to use land for speculative gain in exchange of meagre promises of jobs and growth. Land-grabbing has far reaching negative impacts on local peoples’ access to essential goods and services apart from displacement and environmental degradation that are associated with it.
People who are resisting land grabbing, among them women human rights defenders, face diverse forms of violence including physical attacks and sexual abuse, on a daily basis.
5. Entrenched patriarchal foundations that structure the capitalist system
This patriarchal foundation is particularly hegemonic in today’s neoliberal models.
The many ways in which political economy and development are connected to sexuality or gender is evident: think how capitalism defines what can even be characterized as labour and ties human worth to wage-labour productivity.
For the most part, women’s position in the global economy continues to be one of gender-based labour exploitation with women’s work undervalued in precarious jobs, domestic subsistence, reproduction, and in unwaged household production. Because reproductive labour has been naturalized as women's unpaid work, it has provided an immense subsidy to capitalism at the same time as a source of gender oppression and subjugation.
This situation is aggravated by the fact that as social protection mechanisms begin to dwindle, women’s care burden increases.
Further, the phenomenon of global migration spurred on by thousands of economic refugees escaping oppressive poverty across the globe is not estranged to that of capitalist gender power relations. Remittances become a major source of development financing for the families and communities, but at a major cost for women migrants who struggle to earn a living wage in their new country.
In the same vein, we have seen how patriarchal capitalist systems are using violence and oppression to maintain their status quo. Rising global expenditures in militarism and violence, both perpetrated by state and non-state actors, is increasingly used to control dissent, women’s bodies and voice and settle economic, political and social disputes.
Across the world, violence, incarceration and discrimination disproportionately targets
women, communities of colour,
indigenous peoples,
people with disabilities,
sex workers,
impoverished people, and
LGBTQI people.
An intersectional analysis linking gender, race, ethnicity, age, ability, nationality, sexual orientation and gender identity, among other status is needed to challenge structural violence and its links with a capitalist global system.
A profound crisis in the current global governance system is also evident in the feeble inter-governmental agreements reached and how they often lack the most fundamental accountability mechanisms. The multilateral system that served global governance before is failing to respond to the current multiple crises. The same system continues to be deeply undemocratic, with increasing presence and power by corporations occupying the spaces where States used to be.
Rethinking, Renewing & Reactivating
These threats challenge feminists to re-think our framework and strategies. To renew and reactivate our commitment to movement building with others for a just economy.
They challenge us to consider broad agendas for socio-economic transformations, from a feminist perspective, in ways that address the realities of the majority of the impoverished. Now is the time to bring about change for a just economy and to address the persistent systemic challenges.
La activista y académica Soma Kishore Parthasarathy señala que existen diversas formas de pensar los bienes comunes.
En un sentido más convencional, se los entiende como recursos naturales destinados a ser usados por quienes dependen de su uso. Sin embargo, el concepto de «bienes comunes» se ha expandido para incluir recursos como los conocimientos, la herencia, la cultura, espacios virtuales e incluso el clima. Es un concepto anterior al régimen de propiedad individual y que aportó las bases para la organización social. Las definiciones que aportan las entidades gubernamentales limitan su alcance a los recursos de la tierra y materiales.
El concepto de los bienes comunes se apoya en la práctica cultural de compartir espacios de subsistencia y recursos como dones de la naturaleza, para el bien común, y para la sostenibilidad de lo que es común a todxs.
Contexto
Los bienes comunes de la humanidad están cada vez más amenazados porque las naciones y fuerzas del mercado continúan colonizándolos, explotándolos y ocupándolos.
En algunos contextos favorables, los «bienes comunes» tienen el potencial de habilitar una posición de autonomía sobre todo para las mujeres bajo opresión económica desde la que pueden negociar sus múltiples necesidades y aspiraciones.
Perspectiva feminista
Cuando a las mujeres y a otros géneros oprimidos se les niega el acceso a los bienes comunes y la posibilidad de controlarlos, se refuerza el patriarcado.
Por eso, una economía feminista busca restaurar los derechos legítimos de las comunidades a estos recursos comunes. Esa autonomía les permite mantenerse a sí mismas al mismo tiempo que desarrollan sistemas más igualitarios de gobernabilidad y de uso de esos recursos. Una economía feminista reconoce los roles de las mujeres y les ofrece las mismas oportunidades para tomar decisiones, es decir, las coloca en igualdad de condiciones como demandantes de esos recursos.
Feminism And The Politics Of The Commons (en inglés) [El feminismo y la política de los bienes comunes] de Silvia Federici analiza la política de los bienes comunes desde una posición feminista determinada por la lucha contra la discriminación sexual y el trabajo reproductivo para aclarar en qué condiciones el principio de los bienes comunes se puede convertir en fundamento de un programa anticapitalista.
Meet the Solidarity Network, a health and service union mostly led by women. Emerging as a response to increasing precarity, severe underpayment and hostile work environments faced by workers in Georgia, Solidarity Network fights for dignified compensation and work places.
Its goal? To create a national worker’s democratic movement. To do so, it has been branching out, organizing and teaming up with other local and regional unions and slowly creating a network of unions and empowering women workers to become union leaders.
Its political approach is a holistic one. For Solidarity Network, labor rights issues are directly connected to broader national political and economic agendas and reforms. That’s why they are pushing for tax justice, women and LGBTQIA+ rights, and fighting against the dismantling of the Georgian welfare state.
The Solidarity Network is also part of Transnational Social Strike (TSS), a political platform and infrastructure inspired by migrant, women and essential worker organizing that works to build connections between labor movements across borders and nurture global solidarity.
